RiverMuse PRO includes a Reusable Business Logic (RBL) engine to streamline the creation of all configuration components in a single reusable package.

The configuration is loaded through a text file; it is then parsed and converted by a back-end engine that updates the configuration of multiple components within the RiverMuse product. This is a vast change from traditional Manager of Managers (MoM) solutions as configurations from multiple components are incorporated in a single configuration.

The RBL engine serves to:
– Map organizational processes into the product through one configuration channel
– Fuel the creation of a community driven repository (aka App Store). Configuration packages can be shared or bought. (i.e. a configuration package for grouping events by event type, and performing isolated problem correlation; a configuration package for interpreting Cisco alarms and integrating with Cisco inventory tools to populate RiverMuse dynamic variables).

RiverMuse PRO also incorporates a presence management engine that can discover entities on demand.

This is most useful when new alarms are reported for devices/entities not yet present in a CMDB or inventory management system. A RiverMuse Business Logic Package can first lookup Configuration Item information from the CMDB, and if nothing is found, attempt to perform a discovery using the RiverMuse Presence Management System. This will provide many additional variables that can be leveraged through correlations, automations, and escalations.

RiverMuse PRO includes a centralized rules management wizard.

Whether there are 1 or 50 remotely deployed collectors, rules are configured in a central location through a GUI. Within a traditional Manager of Managers (MoM) solution, the process of obtaining events, performing correlation, and providing business context are usually separate and distinct. Legacy MoM architectures typically require business logic rules to be updated at various levels and multiple components within their system and frequently using different, proprietary scripting languages. This creates a management challenge – and makes it hard for operations teams to keep up with infrastructure shifts.

RiverMuse PRO provides the facility to consolidate your Data Center Operations in a single pane of glass, and achieve Operational Excellence by automating tasks and streamlining processes.

RiverMuse Core, the first enterprise-class open source Real-time Consolidated Operations Console system ideally collects information via SNMP traps and Syslog messages out-of-the-box. Additionally it supports 8 standards-based APIs to obtain data from virtually any source (gSOAP, Perl, Java, C++, XML, PHP, Python, and Ruby on Rails). RiverMuse PRO builds on top of RiverMuse Core and provides a presence management discovery engine, a powerful enterprise desktop console, dynamic alert enrichment from external systems, enhanced scalability, and additional functionalities to streamline organizational processes and dramatically simplify system maintenance.

Perhaps the most compelling reason for pursuing a Consolidated Operations Console solution is being buried in a myriad of tools. And more importantly having little or no business context mapped to the results. The need for a so-called Manager-of-Managers MOM solution becomes more evident the more complex and dynamic an infrastructure becomes – thus requiring various tools to manage and monitor the environment. While multiple monitoring tools are great for specific tasks such as application monitoring, transaction monitoring, or communication device monitoring, problems that affect more than one silo take longer to identify and isolate.

RiverMuse PRO solves this problem by centralizing data across all the different tools, and retrieving events directly from devices when needed. To perform this, RiverMuse PRO includes passive as well as active collectors such as the RiverMuse VMWare agent. This active collector natively interprets CIM (Common Information Model) formatted data streams. Events from different environments are consolidated in one repository, where cross-domain correlation can occur. This allows operations personnel to quickly identify the problem and associated symptoms.

RiverMuse PRO incorporates the event processing scalability of leading commercial Manager-of-Manager solutions without sacrificing granularily.

In other words, all events related to a specific alert are kept in our system and made available on demand including through a launch in context tool. Additionally, correlation can occur against events and alerts. Other leading Manager of Managers tools are also resource intensive and require several install instances to provide value. In contrast, RiverMuse PRO was incorporates a small footprint to curb the overhead and maintenance requirements of legacy MOM solutions without sacrificing elegance and functionality.

Over the last few years, the heightened pace of innovation in service delivery technologies has increased the complexity of IT Operations Management for organizations of all sizes. This problem is particularly acute for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME’s) including regional managed service providers – which have traditionally operated with a lean staff and simpler but silo-based management systems. As long as the technologies they managed were relatively isolated and did not change rapidly, this management and monitoring structure worked fine. However, with the rapid advent of new technologies and the increasing pressure to do more with less – the very fabric of enterprise services has undergone a sea change.  

For example, converged communication services today no longer carry only data, but latency-sensitive voice and video packets that require considerable systems and application processing. Virtualized systems have completely overturned the conservative “one application per server” rule that was a costly, but safe choice for many IT managers. Expectations on utilization rates of virtualized servers are now pegged at more than fifty percent, instead of single digit rates.  Return on investment expectations has likewise increased considerably, and focuses on the effective delivery of end-to-end services (like say web apps, voice or video) rather than individual infrastructure availability. And lately, cloud based architectures are making resource allocation and monitoring even more dynamic and distributed.

While all of these changes have helped reign in IT budgets and do more with less, they also have introduced more specialized service components within scalable multi-tier architectures that are far more complex to manage and monitor. Many of these components are dynamic and can be moved or re-allocated based on advanced automated tools – for e.g. the movement of virtual machines across a server farm or entire applications from the enterprises premises to the cloud. Interestingly enough, while the first adopters of virtualization were large enterprises, recent analyst reports predict that x86 virtualization adoption in SME’s will outstrip large enterprise penetration levels in the next few years.

The implication of the structural shift in the nature of service delivery technologies and management is that SME’s will have to contend with vastly different kind of operational challenges going forward.

If you work in an SME or mid tier MSP organization – what kind of challenges do you see? On our part we will try and relate what we hear from our customers on this topic in later posts.

The concept of Manager of Managers (MoM) has existed for many years but does it mean the same today as it always has?

MoMs were introduced to overcome the problem where lower order management systems e.g. Element Management Systems (EMS) gave a very fragmented view of the network, leaving it up to operations staff to piece together the puzzle to form a picture of the complete network and its current status. This picture often only existed in the mind of the user and the detail of that picture dependent on the individual’s experience. Correlation of events across the diverse ‘stove pipe’ solutions was primarily a visual correlation on the part of the user.

The introduction of MoMs enabled Network operations staff to pull together management information into one central point. Thus providing a single integrated view of the entire network and enabling the introduction of automated correlation systems. This is why MOM is sometimes referred to in some circles as the ‘single pane of glass’. While the concept was fine, in the early days the practice was somewhat limited by the lack of integration capabilities supported by the lower order systems. Standard interfaces and APIs were few and far between. It probably wasn’t until the development of standards such as the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) that MoM capability became a reality. With the advent of web services enabling more federated integration between individual management systems this has received further impetus.

Today we see the adoption of MoM concepts being widely used, although ironically the term itself seems to have faded from our common vocabulary. While the term ‘MoM’ has traditionally been associated with consolidation of lower order systems into the Network Layer, the same principles are now being applied for managing systems, applications, services, customers or business units etc. Effective management at these higher levels still depends on the collection of data and information from the underlying systems. So the deployment of MoMs continues to gather pace and indeed some existing network centric MoMs are being re-positioned for managing at these higher layers with varying degrees of effectiveness. Undoubtedly, we will see wider adoption of Service Management Systems, SLA Management Systems, Business Management Systems and so on, each a new generation of MoM in their own right. For example, the BSM (Business Service Management) dashboard is a type of MoM albeit designed less for real time operations support than for broader business and technology alignment.

The question remains whether any of the current crop of MoM type technologies is ready to take on the mantle for real time dynamic infrastructure support? More about that in a later blog.

Ian Best